Freedom

Thank you mister Smith and in honor of your last name I thought I'd post this link. https://youtu.be/M5n4mJkVivs The logical argument that Dr. Peterson might have a flaw in if I were to adapt Dr. Quentin Smith's argument is that a story implies an ending. An answer to "why is there something rather than nothing" but if everything is infinite then the only logical answer is a previous moment caused it to exist. If I were to combine that with my suggested argument then stories presume an unanswered question, which is that human beings are important in God's plan, but this also implied that human beings weren't important intrinsically and this would imply some type of moral nihilism for God, which would be that everything merely exists so that he would survive. A presumed Felt Meaning of the World implies an immediate context for when human values interact with time/space values. This also implies a steady state of relationships that continually steady and self affirming so that short term fixes like voodoo and beliefs are no longer relevant and truth as a weapon becomes obsolete because a truth field of human relationships keeps things self affirming and the beauty and can be naturally accepted and the garbage naturally discarded by human beings in relationship to their own individual autonomy. This has profound implications for the relevance of Jungian psychology except as a method for diagnosing maladaptive skills at navigating human relationships or in climbing out of very deep dark time/space black holes but even in those cases it's only possible to climb out if one was healthy to begin with, strangely. Common sense allows for temporary messes at the expense of order to foster healthy relationships in Jungian terms and so that's an above below bridge so to speak.