Its decided Capitalism wins

But perhaps a simple refutation of tyranny and communism in one logical argument would due. One aspect is a variation of Quentin Smith's Atheological arguments for atheism and its application to competitive advantage explored by free market capitalism with a variation of Alvin Plantanga's basic belief argument for belief in God Every human being represents a part of the whole. A person's existence is good by definition. Every human is a part of the whole and every human logically entails the whole. Meaning no one has the right to decide whether some people deserve to exist or not. Its an assumed given otherwise every human would have to infinitely regress to justify their existence in a regressive self destructive manner that is destructive both to themselves and to the environment. Therefore what's good or evil is what's good or evil in a single human's wise use of competitive advantage. Everyone is limited by the whole as being part of the whole. Meaning naturalism is true in that nothing that isn't already part of nature can affect it. Competitive advantage and the pre existing assumption of right to exist is that every incomplete aspect of a person will always be followed by another incomplete aspect that makes a wisdom complete and justifies both life forms right to exist. No one can be over the comparative advantage unless it annihilated the existence of the whole. Therefore no God or human can decide how two pieces of competitive advantages fit except for two humans in the environment being human. Communism defines goodness as what people can do for others and not themselves that logically entails infinite regress that can't ever logically be justified that prejudged humans as not having a right to exist. Therefore Capitalism is logically ethical and coherent and communism is unethical and logically incoherent. Therefore people have a right to exist and not have to justify their right to exist except through natural survival. *My personal life research into the link between comparative advantage and the Felt Meanings of the World and An Atheological argument from Cosmology inspired by Spinoza by Quentin Smith is inspired by my Aunt Stephanie's ex husband Dr. Greg George who is a PhD in economics and a professor at Macon State University. The link between theistic and atheistic philosophy that linked Alvin Plantingas Basic beliefs theory with Quentin Smith's The Felt Meanings of the World was suggested by my old Professor of philosophy at Miramar College in San Diego Dr. Bill Puett. He suggested it to me when i was at my lowest but saw my potential and was the first professor to encourage me to make a name for myself. The true link between Quentin Smith and Alvin Plantingas ideas is best described as logical proof of religious freedom that not even the God of truth could get too. I can know that there's no possibility of a God King, but i can respect the comparative advantage if those who might need to believe that but also know they can't impose that belief on existence or on anyone. Separation of Church and State means that it "neither breaks my nose or robs my house" what religious beliefs my friends or neighbors might devote themselves and their spirits for personal reasons.