The relevance of my deductive reasoning

Based on my ethical theories the reason why moral reasoning doesn't work to make the world better is that groups had protected themselves against individuals with moral clarity by making their business about social control. This is perfectly consistent with my logical deduction that the deepest form of reality is mechanical and non personal. Moral reasoning of what should or shouldn't be done has an infinite regress unless a non personal center is found. But morality does exist and so as a priority the most non moral form of clarity takes precedence. This is where my deduction is interesting. Me as an individual thats lazy idifferent and relaxed was challenged by social groups as me being "selfish" it would seem that in terms of priority me as an individual is self evidently more in tune with the mechanical impersonal universe than groups based on social control. The lack of individuality had led to that weakness that made room for someone as selfish and self seeking as being more right to the impersonal mechanical nature of things than groups based on social control. Unless social control groups don't want to fall, then they're only solution is to respect their own individuality and to respect mine. In terms of group identity versus individual identity individual identity is more in tune with the impersonal and mechanical nature of reality and so individual identity has an infinitely stronger foundation than group identity due to its amoral foundation. Communism fails because it has a moral core at the expense of nature. The logical contradiction of communism is that the rightness of group identity is always right even if the world was destroyed and inevitably it would be uf people committed to communism because inevitably an individual would be right and the group would be wrong. And so when people resisted my loyalty to my family and friends at the expense of money that was actually because of communist tendencies and communism was destroying the earth.