Warning about Jungian Psychology and a tangent from my "Skyla to me" Post

I just happened to be writing about Jungoan psychology and is the perfect mission statement for this blog. Many blogs fail because the belief that common sense is more prevelant than Jungian psychosis recovery. (Christine im looking at you. Youre armedwithcoffee blog failed for not making Jungian psychosis recovery your purpose for poetry. The Jungian lack and psychosis you attracted proves that.) *Jungian psychology is like Newtonian physics. it makes some decent predictions if one doesn't look too deep to notice the contradictions. In truth Jungian psychology is more defensive in preserving innocence through story telling but only works if youre already functional and healthy. Cognative behavioral therapy is better for coherent healing in my experience as a layman. But on the agressive side Jungian theory does work well when using innocence to cope with overwhelming universe issues with story telling innocence psychology to cope with an indifferent universe. It allows human psychology to find new wisdoms to adapt to the universe. The problem and limitation of Jungian psychology is that it can lead a person to suffer from psychosis or the delusion that their internal psychology as a normal person has no relevance when it clearly does as Jungian archetypal play is a coping mechanism of superficial quality meant to adapt to overwhelming external realities. In fact the collective resistance to an obvious need for internal healing and return to normative integrity is likely a symptom of grandiose Jungian psychosis that symptomatically leads a person to grandiosity and the ability to rationalize their lose of integrity to outside universal forces that can allow a person to avoid internal traumatic healing by appeals to general "higher purposes." Higher purposes do exist, which is why its nearly impossible for a human being to recover who would be suffering from Jungian Psychosis. In fact the emphasis on "internal healing" as a pathology of spiritual circles is likely due to the irresolveable denial and incoherence of over emphasis on external realities such people are incapable of fixing but unable to not focus on. To do so would cause a feeling of "betrayal" of their "higher calling" when healing would be the best thing. My blog has been my own recovery from Jungian Psychosis with the knowledge of my genuine spiritual mission intact and an effort to help other Jungian divers put past in context and help them and me return to sanity. Sometimes it would be a betrayal and sometimes it wouldn't. A healthy Jungian explorer is impossible to dinguish from psychosis except in cases of obvious experiential inccoherence that justifies their spiritual path. In other words only the healthy tend to stay healthy. There's no such thing as not having a physical relationship with the Jungian collective consciousness. Im always going to write poetry and continue with my journey. What recovery is is reconciling external spiritual realities with sane coping mechanisms. How to deal with Jungian wounds next to you as an external and internal landscape (internal because believing too much in the outer world would cause you to forget that all logical deductions needed to deal with what's outside is related to the inner mechanics of your being. Social skills is very real and a softer logical syllogistic reality. A necessary softness to bring to Jungian wounds to keep life soft and at an appropriate pace.) Alcoholics Anonymous has a version of the 12 steps to deal with this. But the 12 steps are only another version of psychosis if you don't bring Cognative Behavioral Therapy or some version pf soft social skills with you. A.A. is a Jungian wound that needs healing. The only sanity you find there is what you take with you. That's why most alchololics never recover.They confused Jungian psychosis with genuine recovery.