Comraderie, laughing with friends, intimacy and close understanding just aren't things that can be found on the inward journey. They're just not there unless you bring it there. And even then only in small morsels to keep you from starving on your way back to the surface.
It's like the Jerry Seinfeld Joke "did you eat I didn't eat. I've been eating jolly rancher all day I need something solid."
That's what the books and the gardening and the talent fishing is when in the inner journey. It's just non solid jolly rancher that is only as solid as you are. As the corner of you that gives you shape.
There are life forces and then there are perfect prismed corners.
The corner space of being a home as one's own independent space is what a god is. It isn't the life force that best reflects life. It's the perfect logical structure on a border corner stone. A god is a human being like anyone else, except they were born on a corner stone that's a perfect partial blueprint that shows that god how to relate to the world in the perfect ethical way possible.
In my case I inhabit the impersonal mechanics of humanity. My cleverness being the necessary wisdom to keep me responsible and sincere so that humans can have that without having to be clever and responsible as much as me. The thing that was threatening me and humanity wasn't any human entity, and therefore no god is my true enemy. I keep the impersonal chaos at bay with my natural wisdom of clever human nature.
Sincerity is what makes being around people beautiful. People are only sincere if people are allowed to take a person's presence for granted. Gratitude is a present thing and only possible if people are free to take you for granted. Gratitude like love is a gift and not an obligation. As soon as someone suggests that others should be grateful they block natural gratitude from ever manifesting. People had hurt themselves by ignorantly insisting on gratitude.
If people are allowed to take things and people for granted then they are more able to see things as they are and to map out all the territory around them. That sense of freedom allows for oxygen that allows for respect. Resentment tends to come from people thinking that they're drowning and blaming whoever happens to be nearby, whether it's their fault or not. Indifference is a natural flotation device. The less people are concerned with me the more people get to float around enjoying life for the sake of life without the need for permission from a higher authority. If one looks hard enough people will discover there is no such thing as a higher authority. A higher authority would mean that only one plane has morality to it, and that's clearly not the case. All morality would have to be able to have common ground to be able to have a conversation.
That means that all morality between planes are complimentary incomplete authorities with each moral center the prime authority of knowledge, in the same way that a quantum mechanics scientist would be an authority on quantum mechanics. A teacher is always equal to a student willing to learn as long as the teacher is willing to learn from the student. That's why professors love graduate students. They breath life into the professor with present knowledge of the present world that the professor just can't have without talking to the student.
Authority is about shared information with specific fields of expertise with people who are the prime movers in their fields.
In that sense, the field of the divine is most closely like a college or a university. The Most High God would be the prime expert, but due to his limitations would have to have allies with fields of expertise that God just couldn't have access too without talking to other experts with specific fields of perfect logic.
(If that weren't the case, the world would already be perfect. That's the only solution to the problem of evil that actually makes any sense. This is a theodicy that allows an indifferent universe to exists that's entirely mechanical that's perfectly coherent with the existence of a perfect God.)
Logical arguments from evil actually refute every other defense that excludes conversation that would make progress on the problem of evil. Problem implies something that's solvable.
The purpose of the Logical Argument from Evil is that it refutes every blind faith defense so that everyone could work together to solve the problem of evil.
Otherwise philosophy would just be intellectual masturbation.
What extroversion is, ironically, is THE ONLY solution to the Logical Argument from Evil that fetishisting introversion logically excluded everyone from discovering except for potentially a few people.
This created temporary life rafts for people who couldn't do what I can do for example, so that limbo is both a safety net and a power structure of checks and balances that keeps everyone aware on all sides that are only ethical pull points so that no one is hurt, and only inconvenienced in case of emergencies.
It also shows something interesting about human nature, in that anything personally inconvenient is what people tend to label as evil.
Sometimes what is labeled as evil is evil, but the motive for labeling it as evil is only inconvenience.
People tend to view rest as the highest good and inconvenience as the lowest evil.
This isn't trivial or petty.
Home is unearned wisdom of rest, and so this moral mindset is actually a good guide to demoralize existence and make it easy to navigate and how to recognize home energy, rest, from evil energy, inconvenience. If one is always in a state of rest no matter if the external is home or evil then fear is no longer as relevant and can be completely conquered and dismissed as entirely irrelevant eventually.
No comments:
Post a Comment