Pain has no obligation to it.

 https://youtu.be/MJxbiHBpSc4

First im not allowed energetically to be physically violent, because my wisdom makes that unnecessary for me. 

Thats a wisdom that a woman would have to learn to be near me. 

Once thats understood all that other ego expectations go out the door because harmonious learning would create natural harmony. 

That habit of a woman not needing to adapt to a man's needs in a relationship is based on the assumption of a woman needing to be physically protected and is why a woman tends to be parasitic and expectant and poor at relationships and friendships due to this expectation that I will never fulfill. 

I think it was the feminist manifesto that observed the parasitic power struggle between men and women as the very basis of natural antagonism between men and women. 

Women like the idea that men should protect women physically because it allows women to suck men dry and give nothing in return because the spirit is incompatible with those types of physical needs. 

And rather than help men, some women prefer to validate their resentment and exploit and abandon men.

To say that men and women are the same means that we all have blind sides and need to watch our own backs. 

The wisdom of the cat is the perfect antidote to this. The cat is perfect in his or her expectation of safety and fearless affectionate abilities because a cat's wisdom of free will means only life that respects life can be close to a cat. 

There's no need to separate genders as any gender can embody cat wisdom. 

The implication being that to not embody a cat is a deliberate choice to not respect life and to be anti-life. 

What Teal Swann is suggesting is that by being anti life women can make men more anti life and exploit them. 

But that would end existence. 

The cat wisdom shows that men and women are the same. Its only resentment and entitlement that would pretend otherwise. 

Like i told a woman about another woman who had hurt me. 

She said "Consider how women have been treated in history now that we have a voice some women take it to extremes."

That demonstrates the stupidity of confusing sympathetic history with having any responsibility to someone else's pain whether as a group or as an individual.